So.
The two important goals of intrapreneur are execution time and execution context, so execution time,
the handler often interrupted, must execute quickly.
We have seen what happened when we either delay Desilu and Emily busy being done in propellor.
It can slow down the system and you can also lose in trucks.
So the faster the handler returns, the lower latency, which is especially important for the alarm
systems.
So our execution time on the handler should be very smart.
It should execute very quickly and it should be very small execution context and interpreted as an execution
in our context.
In this context, the local interruption, the CPU, the CPU, local and state disabled.
So we cannot use locking in execution context.
And sleeping's needs to be on what we can use Spindletop and we can reduce Natixis on and on.
So sleeping must be avoided and large amount of work cannot be performed in intrapreneur because the
local interests are disabled.
But what if I want to have a large amount of work?
I cannot have been shot execution time.
So both of these limitations.
About limitations, including the fact that all the enterprise, the most enterprises they can execute
on in this small amount of growth and that they have to do for the remaining of the work to at that
point, they cannot have all the work done in the enterprise because they are disabled or disabled.
And their chances of losing interest, so do this, the handling of it can be divided into two parts
just by the top half and second by the support of Apophis, also known as hot RFQ.
But it's also Misophonia in half.
We have to acknowledge the important task that you need to perform in acknowledging that copying the
necessary stuff from the device, for example, backwards.
And then you have to schedule the bottom of in the bottom half.
You have to perform the remaining standing work, which was not possible or not happen.
Not top Popoff.