So question for you now is what is the problem with this call?
So I have a variable time, which is unsigned long, what I have said is the value is have initialized
it with defense less than in just 10 seconds.
It can seem like nothing but has there is 250 for us to turn into 250, just like you have twenty five
into ten.
Twenty five hundred.
So it's difficult on the five hundred.
So I'm very fine until I hear whether my defense will be the which I read here will be less than the
time.
I'm Donald.
So do you think any problem is there in the school?
A problem in the school in.
And I look, so this can experience or flow when its value is increased beyond its maximum storage limit
so far today, to be done silently to the maximum value is to go to minus one.
So when the discount is equal to the maximum and it is incremental, it will become apparent to zero.
So in this case, suppose he has what you have is.
Some value and liquidity support officers overflowing in this case, this condition will fail because
the face value will be smaller than the time or despite logically being longer, larger.
So this in this case.
Logically, if Lupul fail because
the defeat has been awful.
So how can a white stop on an issue like this happen on issue?
So so you're saying not emotive, so can relate to some rappers, so can provides for macro's for comparing
the goals that currently correctly handle the rapper on the record.
So perhaps you time underscore after an underscore before and after equals time, minutes for the first
time on the score after it returns.
True, if the premise is after them, we suppose if you have one year of defeat, then it will return.
True if time if he is after defeat.
How it works.
So what it does is.
It subtracts eight and then.
Deciding the know.
And then it compares it with whether this is it or not.
So this is how it works.
Very simple logic subtracts with it.
And then you typecast to long.
And that verifies whether this.
Same logic is applied in all the four mackerels, so I'm going to go after him 10 minutes before they
handle the wrap around cases.
So you can see the same thing is let's get hazard, I think the value of the time out the night and
the diamond score after school, after school and going to school before going to school before the.
So Diamond go after.
So this is is.
Eighty six, three, six Amatus, so forty eight, eighty six, amortise seven three eight six, so
timeless after.
So this is the value of seven three eight six defaces for and against.
And what is after the with this one.
And after 2001, before because and what is not before the is zero, this is.
So this is how it is implemented in so.
The diamond went after Democrats minutes before, so I have hammered with defense spending twice that
amount, too, which is defense plus five a.m. and printing the value of time.
So which one is bigger and what one is bigger time or two is shorter of.
So how can you compare how to implement that logic?
I have to subtract both of them.
I'm not one minute I'm out of tune, then I.
Converted into a long term loan and then subtracted.
Compared with.
So the same case ordering a little bit of value here.
In this case.
Some of this is some value and this is some value, what is the value of this?
This will be zero eight and this is the reverse.
This would be one.
That's the first one is zero and second on this one.